So women will be allowed children with no father by virtue of the fact that they can bear the child. Men however are completely denied the chance to bring up a child without a mother.
LORETTA: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
REG: But… you can’t have babies.
LORETTA: Don’t you oppress me.
REG: I’m not oppressing you, Stan. You haven’t got a womb! Where’s the foetus going to gestate?! You going to keep it in a box?!”
Monty Python aside, let’s say a woman gives birth to a child right now, and gives that child to a man to raise. The man is unknown to the woman. Social workers would go nuts about it (while ignoring issues involving work elsewhere no doubt) but isn’t it the same thing? Why is it that this act would be investigated to more depth than women getting the sperm without the friction? Because all men are seem as kiddie-fiddlers? Why cannot a man be afforded the same priviledge as a woman with respect to bringing up a child? It’s got nothing to do with anything more than bias and sexism surely? There is no actual basis for refusal.