<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Romantic Robot &#187; /ignore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://romanticrobot.net/tag/ignore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://romanticrobot.net</link>
	<description>but to you I&#039;m just cold steel.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Polite ignoring</title>
		<link>http://romanticrobot.net/2009/12/27/polite-ignoring/</link>
		<comments>http://romanticrobot.net/2009/12/27/polite-ignoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 12:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[/ignore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://romanticrobot.net/?p=967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One thing I hated about Facebook was that sort of obligation to add people who wanted to add you. There was nothing to say you had to but there felt like there was an expectation, that you would offend if &#8230; <a href="http://romanticrobot.net/2009/12/27/polite-ignoring/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I hated about Facebook was that sort of obligation to add people who wanted to add you. There was nothing to say you had to but there felt like there was an expectation, that you would offend if you did not. This was partly why I deleted my account there then later re-added myself with privacy on full. I think that raises the barrier and makes the person who would request think a little more about the &#8220;relationship&#8221;. I think it also changes expectation levels. It feels like more control is kept by me. I hardly use it these days though but the point is there.</p>
<p>Twitter. Similar thing here. You have to follow certain people, there is an expectation that you will listen to someone you know simply because you know them. There is a world of difference though between a chat down the pub and what is traded online as we know. But you can&#8217;t unfollow them because they&#8217;ll wonder why. Again it&#8217;s this expectation, this etiquette thing. Maybe it&#8217;s just me?<br />
And the other thing which really annoys me about Twitter is the repeat #tags about events. #uksnow was fine, #iphone was not, #meme and others never will be. In fact it&#8217;s not just tags, it&#8217;s @famousperson. Like Stephen Fry will reply? I have no idea what that Kutcher bloke does apart from exchange bodily fluids with Bruce&#8217;s ex. I don&#8217;t want to see all that because it looks like the equivalent of the person on stage at Glastonbury yelling out &#8220;Who want to come up here with me&#8221; and being faced with a sea of screaming jumping wild lunatics. I&#8217;m sure these @famouspeople simply use twitter to boost their fragile egos and give their days meaning. Irritating.</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m on the subject &#8230; I quite like twitter. Love it for news though sometimes it feels like overload when coupled with everything else I stare at and it&#8217;s always the first app to be closed (Tweetdeck with multiple columns depending on news type) and it&#8217;s good for people too. But I have never liked the unfiltered approach. And although I like it I continue to think that the whole service is utterly disposable. 140 characters does not distill, it&#8217;s just 140 characters. No idea how many times I have tweeted and I don&#8217;t care. Take them all away and I wouldn&#8217;t even get annoyed. Would not care. Why would I? If someone said &#8220;Ah, but at 17:16 on November 12 you tweeted that&#8230;&#8221; like I&#8217;d give a damn. Wouldn&#8217;t know why, wouldn&#8217;t be bothered to find out. If these smidges of conversation matter so much why not record what you actually say 24/7? That would make more sense wouldn&#8217;t it? Anyway&#8230;.</p>
<p><a href="http://kiwi-app.net/">Kiwi</a> is a mac twitter client and it has some good rules for highlighting and hiding messages (it does regular expressions if you understand those). It doesn&#8217;t do lists yet but I can move all my lists stuff to another ID anyway. But what is best is that I can ignore a whole person. I&#8217;m testing it now and test hiding 2 people. I say hiding but it&#8217;s actually just coloring them orange so I can check I don&#8217;t catch anything wrongly. And I need to check replies/dm&#8217;s.<br />
So I can exclude all mac-related tweets when Apple do their fangasm presentations, can exclude the annoying @famouspeople and can ignore those people who I really should just unfollow but feel obliged in some way to keep on the sidebar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://romanticrobot.net/2009/12/27/polite-ignoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Support &#8211; nonexistent</title>
		<link>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/12/12/facebook-support-nonexistent/</link>
		<comments>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/12/12/facebook-support-nonexistent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[/ignore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read the information on Facebook&#8217;s help page about deleting my account. (It&#8217;s the top Help search). There is a link in that page which takes you to another page which explains the deletion process. I emailed Facebook. Hi, I &#8230; <a href="http://romanticrobot.net/2008/12/12/facebook-support-nonexistent/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the information on Facebook&#8217;s help page about deleting my account. (It&#8217;s the top Help search). There is a link in that page which takes you to another page which explains the deletion process. I emailed Facebook.</p>
<blockquote><p>Hi,<br />
I have a Facebook account.</p>
<p>http://www.facebook.com/help/contact.php?show_form=delete_account</p>
<p>Does that actually remove all information from your servers? </p></blockquote>
<p>And I just got a reply that had been copied from the page I was looking at there. It is totally obvious where I was, that I had read enough to find that link and I asked a very specific question. But Jordie at Facebook either (1) cannot read that sentence of mine or (2) is having a bad day and couldn&#8217;t be bothered to find the answer or (3) is not allowed to say.<br />
As I blogged yesterday I don&#8217;t actually give a feck if they keep it but at the very least I&#8217;d expect an actual answer from an actual person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/12/12/facebook-support-nonexistent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neat Socialthing feature</title>
		<link>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/08/25/neat-socialthing-feature/</link>
		<comments>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/08/25/neat-socialthing-feature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WWW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[/ignore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://69105.net/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In facebook you can set it so that you see less of someone&#8217;s status updates. Useful because you don&#8217;t have to remove them as a friend, but you might still see some updates. In Twitter you can&#8217;t not see someone &#8230; <a href="http://romanticrobot.net/2008/08/25/neat-socialthing-feature/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In facebook you can set it so that you see less of someone&#8217;s status updates. Useful because you don&#8217;t have to remove them as a friend, but you might still see some updates.<br />
In Twitter you can&#8217;t not see someone unless you remove them. But you might not want to do that.</p>
<p>In Socialthing there is a grey bar with the person&#8217;s name. On the right of that you can choose a colour and next to that is an arrow. Clicking that lets you remove the person from your socialthing view. Neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://romanticrobot.net/2008/08/25/neat-socialthing-feature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

