So the Texan Twat has decided that despite the fact that thousands of decent people want to make poverty history that this just “”doesn’t fit our budgetary process”.”. w.t.f. ?. Explain this … please. The rest of the world has what many many people think is a decent idea, and the head of the USA says “Woah …. not in my game plan”. GWB is stating that the USA is poor ? Must be the case surely because the only explanation must be that the USA cannot afford to pay for it – you know, this IS the CORRECT explanation don’t you ? Can easily afford to keep blasting away in Iraq though, can easily afford to build up for the invasion of Iran – but cannot afford to chip in to help prevent the spread of AIDS.
I like his choice of phrase… “Doesn’t fit our budgetary process”. If you read the thought-provoking http://irregulartimes.com, they had an article yesterday which makes interesting reading. In this article, GWB says of his (drinking and probably drug taking) daughters “I worry about letting these little girls get into a situation where something unpleasant could happen to them”. Well excuse me – I’m fairly bloody confident that your grand frigging plan to grab as much oil as you can has gotten right in the fucking way of many “family processes” as you sent the children of other people to their deaths in a foreign country. I’m sure those parents didn’t think “Hey, let’s breed some bullet fodder for George” yet that is exactly how he sees and treats the offspring of decent people – just like many other leaders do, but at least they’ve probably got the intelligence to not then hand out lines of bullshit about their kids.
Still ….. there are many americans (no, not all, I know that) who will hear both those lines of crap and think that GWB is a decent guy. Idiots.
And Blair ? I wonder what exactly he will do, and I also wonder if it is possible to libel a lying, scheming, pocket-lining, war-mongering, brown-nosing politician such as he. If so, how ? Update: Just caught this in a feed “in free debate erroneous statements are inevitable and must be protected” (http://conformandobey.co.uk) and that link will prove very useful I’m sure – esp the origin of that statement.